Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Technical Difficulties
I tell you this so you will understand why I cannot write any extensive posts--maybe you are relieved? If so, keep it to yourself!
Soon, I hope, I will be reconnected and continue dissertating on various topics of general (or not so general) interest.
Pax
I Need Your Help! Saint...or Sinner???
I am at a loss. Who should I be? What should I wear?? Ideas would be much, much appreciated, O Fair Reader!!
Sunday, October 25, 2009
On a Lighter Note: Chicken!
Saturday, October 24, 2009
“Anglo-Catholic? (Wherein I Discourse upon the Anglican Issue)” OR “My Two Pence (Which Isn’t Very Much these Days!)”
There is similar joy at St Therese Little Flower—a parish in my hometown of Kansas City, where Fr. Ernie Davis greeted the new Constitution with these words:
"Who could have hoped for as much as has been offered? Is the miracle of medical healing attributed to the intercession of John Cardinal Newman any less spectacular than the healing of the divisions in the church? Wasn't it clear that something amazing was about to happen when the relics of St. Therese spent her feast day at York Minster?" (Follow links for more on these two events!)
The “New Evangelization,” passionately preached and promoted by Pope John Paul II, certainly seems to be taking root and flourishing in the Anglican world. Even the secular media has caught wind, and the Wall Street Journal published an article heralding a “new” Church full of renewed liturgical diversity (see: "The Pope Lets a Thousand Liturgies Bloom"). St Therese Little Flower could be seen as a front-runner in this “new” brand of Catholicism (though if you read a bit deeper in history you’ll find that such liturgical and racial diversity is very ancient!). St Therese, a historically African-American parish, now hosts two extremely different liturgical communities, continuing its commitment to active community involvement and social justice, worshiping with a well-established and vibrant Gospel Mass---even as it introduces a second liturgy in the Anglican Use: a solemn High Mass complete with incense, candles and medieval chant.
Notice the rhetoric of aggression: the Church is “poaching,” She’s “parked her tanks” in Canterbury. She’s bringin’ out the Big Guns! This not-so-subtly-implied accusation (actually, not implied at all) of “aggression” on the Church’s part fails to take into consideration the thousands of requests which Rome has received from Anglican groups over the past decade—appeals for full, visible communion with the Catholic Church. This action on the part of the Holy father is a response to a plea for help--not an aggressive initiative. You can read about one such appeal (from the TAC) here. After the TAC sent this particular letter they heard nothing for two years. Many began to think that the appeal of such a small, unimportant group must surely have been lost in the long corridors of the Vatican. Not So! Back in Rome learned men were working to create a radical new structure that would allow not just the TAC but MANY other groups—even whole diocese—to come into the Church while still retaining much of their own traditions and hierarchy. As we can see from the excerpt at the beginning of my post, this Constitution was MUCH, MUCH more generous that anyone was expecting. Aggressive? Perhaps aggressively generous. SO—first small rant on my part, excuse me.
Now I have no time at the moment to write a dissertation on the Theology of the Body, women’s rights or roles in the Church (I’m thinking about Mary…), or sex in the scheme of salvation. I will only say this: For most “Anglican defectors,” of whom I am one, the PARTICULAR issues of womens’ ordination and the homosexual lifestyle are only SYMPTOMS of the larger problems inherent in Anglicanism as a whole. These concerns include, but are not limited to: lack of a legitimate, Spirit-led teaching-tradition consistent with the teaching of the Church throughout history, and lack of consistent scriptural interpretation in the hierarchy (i.e. lack of what Catholics call Magisterium). Also, concerns about sacramental legitimacy, loss of Apostolic Succession, and desire for unity with the visible Church (One, Holy, Apostolic) on earth. The ordination of women, the endorsement of the homosexual lifestyle, the proliferation of unorthodoxy even in the highest levels of the episcopacy (ahem! Bishop Spong!), only appear as SYMPTOMS of the problems listed above. Jeffrey Steel, a former Episcopalian priest who recently was received into the Church, says this of his reasons for leaving his former ecclesiastical home:
Now, moving on to issues surrounding Anglo-Catholics. Over the years many groups of traditional Anglicans have united in a heartfelt prayer for renewed unity with the See of Peter. These groups, separated from the C of E to one degree or another, have been, in many ways, “wanderers upon the face of the earth,” with little or no connection to the Body Catholic which they so strongly desire to be in union with. Some of these groups asked for corporate reunion with the Catholic Church (I have heard estimates of somewhere around 1,000 bishops). Now the Pope has presented a radical, new pathway to unity. The core of what is particularly Anglican will be preserved. It is possible that Anglican seminaries will appear throughout the Catholic world. The discipline of celibacy will be suspended for those who wish to be ordained. Diocese will remain under Anglican jurisdiction wherever possible. If you have been Catholic even for a little bit you realize how radical this all actually is.
Now I hear members of these same groups murmuring amongst themselves and asking questions like: “will we have to accept papal authority?” “will we have to accept the Marian dogmas?” Hmm, I think. The Pope is being very generous, I think. He is moving ecclesiastical mountains to get these people on board. But, in the Catholic Church, some things can never, ever be changed. Dogmas of the faith are one of those things (Marian dogmas included). And the Church’s converts throughout the centuries have always understood that they must accept “all that the Holy Catholic Church believes, holds and teaches” in ORDER to become Catholic. (At least that was what I said when I was confirmed.)
Now I would like to briefly (yes! I’ll try!) address one last bit of the Anglican puzzle. We all know that the more liberal “progressive” types of Anglicans will happily remain in the C of E or her American counterpart. They will probably not consider the Pope’s offer for themselves. The Anglo-Catholics (both inside and outside the C of E) have their own set of issues which I have addressed, in part, above.
But there is one more group within the Anglican Communion (or Dis-union) who seem, in my opinion, curiously neglected in the current discussion—neglected, in fact, by the secular media, the Anglican discussions and the Catholic blogosphere. This is the Anglican tradition from which I have sprung: namely the Evangelical wing of the Anglican body. This group is represented by associations such as AMIA (Anglican Missions in America) and the Continuing Anglicans. While I was an undergraduate at Wheaton College in Illinois I found myself at the crux of the “Continuing Anglican” movement. When I was a Junior my Episcopalian church split and soon-to-be-Thomas More and myself went along with the “more orthodox” split. All Souls AMIA parish was (and, I trust, is!) a lovely, warm community with an Anglo-Catholic liturgical style and a good foundation of the best of Evangelical theology and zeal. Many of these Evangelical Anglican parishes are affiliated in some way with Anglican bishops in Africa (our bishop was, I think, Rwandan).
Here ends dissertation!!
Bl. ohn Henry Newman, captain of the Tiber Swim Team, pray for us!!
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Big News for Anglicans
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Friday at Kellie
Father's Fiftieth, or, My First Ceilidh
Friday, October 16, 2009
Project Dawn: 15 October
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
What I've Been Reading (and Other Thoughts)
The other day I received a rather thrilling package via snail mail. Included in two heavy parcils were--Joy beyond Joy!--my books, shipped all the way across the ocean. I am fascinated by the fact that these boxes made their physical journey from my little red house in Winston-Salem (where I am Not), to the post office in that same city (in Hanes Mall perchance? Or Miller Street? …these oh so recently lost place-names already posses an almost mystical, invocative power in my rather raw emotions…already becoming foreign, full of magic. The anxiety and sweetness involved in this: I will never go back!).
Anyway, these books, these physical things, Pandora’s boxes of so much joy and stress and interest, made their slow and physical way across the ocean to London (?), Manchester, (?) Edinburgh…real cities all…and across the firth into Fife, through Kircaldy, Leven, and the other smaller villages of the East Neuk. And arrived at the shiny wooden door, painted lacquer black, with a doorknocker like a human face. My house: Dunearn. (Fellow Medievalists…Does this mean something in Old English? Anyone? “dun” “earn”… Dune Eagle, Moor Eagle, Valley Eagle, Highland Eagle? Or “dun” like a color? Sallow Eagle? …Any help?)
First, one must eat, I say.
The other two books (fiction) were purchased at our favorite Winston-Salem haunt, Edward McKay used bookstore. Purchased, I might add, for under $2.50 thank you very much.
The first is The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins, who was a friend and contemporary of Charles Dickens, and shares Dickens’ ability to paint extraordinarily (at times uncomfortably) vivid characters. In addition, The Moonstone has been described (by so great a figure as T.S. Eliot) as “the first, the longest, and the best of modern English detective novels.” Now, detective stories are one of my (many) weaknesses. A weakness I justify by citing great minds who shared it—T.S. Eliot being one (he read them), G.K. Chesterton and Dorothy Sayers (they wrote them), and W.H. Auden—who read them avidly and wrote a fascinating essay on them in The Well of Narcissus (collected later in The Dyer’s Hand). He says this of “the Whodunit”:
“For me, as for many others, the reading of detective stories is an addiction like tobacco or alcohol. The symptoms of this are: firstly, the intensity of the craving—if I have any work to do, I must be careful not to get hold of a detective story for, once I begin one, I cannot work or sleep till I have finished it. Secondly, its specificity—the story must conform to certain formulas (I find it very difficult, for example, to read one that is not set in rural England). And, thirdly, its immediacy. I forget the story as soon as I have finished it, and have no wish to read it again. […] Such reactions convince me that, in my case at least, detective stories have nothing to do with works of art.”
This confession and description might be enough to put anyone off these pieces of “non-art” and (what he later describes as) “daydream literature,” except that Auden acknowledges (and I acknowledge with him) the need for escapist literature. Besides, the “daydream” of detective stories is such a good dream:
“The fantasy, then, which the detective story addict indulges is the fantasy of being restored to the Garden of Eden, to a state of innocence, where he may know love as love and not as the law.” (Sounds good, yes?)
The second novel which I brought along in bags was Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities, which, I’m ashamed to admit, I had never read before. I’m sure that all of you read it in Middle School and (knowing my Academe-savvy audience) probably think that “oooh, Dickens is sooo passe! His plots are sooo contrived and sentimental. Besides, who reads novels with plot these days?” (Note: I have heard two such “critiques” of Dickens in the past week…one of by the chap who deemed himself worthy to write the Afterword for my edition of the novel…)
Ah well. If you feel that way, I’m sorry (for you). I thoroughly enjoyed Dickens' wonderfully contrived and artificial plot, and I admit that I cried like a baby throughout the sentimental bit at the end.
[Note: I will include in a separate post my favorite passage from the novel—probably often quoted, but I will quote it again!]
NOW! Back to my books. After finishing the above-mentioned novels, my house is entirely empty of fiction, which was a delibrate action on my part. Poetry’s the thing for me these days. In future “What I’m Reading" posts expect to see more poets highlighted, as I attempt to navigate the swirling ocean of contemporary verse.
“I’ve always felt that there was some moral integrity in being dead,” one of my St Andrews colleagues admitted to me recently. In general, I share this (completely irrational) prejudice. However, I intend to squash it. Stay tuned next time for some Live Poets.
St Thomas Aquinas (who is dead, but Not) --Ora Pro Nobis!
Pray for our brains, that we might use them!
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Brian "Nikolai" Tsai
Fish Friday (Languoustines)
Now that I'm on my own, with a set budget, I have become a culinary model of frugality (does that make sense?). I made a *casserole* the first night and ate it for 5+ meals. Now, I will never eat that casserole again, but note: 10 British Pounds Sterling...5+ meals--less than 2 British Pounds per meal. And I wrote the purchase in my little book.